ὃν εὗρον ἐγκαλούμενον περὶ ζητημάτων τοῦ νόμου αὐτῶν, μηδὲν ⸀δὲ ἄξιον θανάτου ἢ δεσμῶν ⸂ἔχοντα ἔγκλημα⸃.

on euron egkaloumenon peri zetematon tou nomou auton, meden rde axion thanatou e desmon [?]ekhonta egklema[?].

quem inveni accusari de quaestionibus legis ipsorum nihil vero dignum morte aut vinculis habentem crimen

Whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

Whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

Whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

I found out that he was accused concerning questions of their law, but had nothing charged against him deserving of death or chains.

I perceived him to be accused about questions of their law, but there was nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

whom I found to be accused about questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

“And I found that they were accusing him about charges of their law, and there was no cause worthy for imprisonment or death against him.”

whom I found to be accused of questions of their law, but to have no charge laid against him making him worthy of death or of bonds.

Whom I found to be accused concerning questions of their law; but having nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bands.

whom I found to be accused about questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

I found that he was being accused about questions of their law, but charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.

and found their accusations had to do with disputes about Jewish teachings. He wasn't accused of anything for which he deserved to die or to be put into prison.

I found out that the accusations were about disputed matters in their law, and that there was no charge that merited death or chains.

I found that, although he was charged with questions about their Law, there was no charge against him deserving death or imprisonment.

I found he was accused with reference to controversial questions about their law, but no charge against him deserved death or imprisonment.

and I found him to be accused over questions about their Law, but under no accusation deserving death or imprisonment.

I found that the accusation had to do with questions about their law, but there was no charge against him that deserved death or imprisonment.

I soon discovered the charge was something regarding their religious law--certainly nothing worthy of imprisonment or death.

Whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death, or of bonds.

and I discovered that the charge had to do with questions of their Law, but that he was accused of nothing for which he deserves death or imprisonment.

I found him to be accused about questions of their law, but not to be charged with anything worthy of death or of imprisonment.

The Jewish leaders said that he had not obeyed their own laws. But that was all. We could not put him in prison or kill him because of these things. That would not be right.

whom I found accused concerning questions of their law, and having no accusation worthy of death or bonds;

I learned they were holding him because of something about their Law. There was no reason for him to be killed or to be put in prison.

“I perceived that he was accused about questions of their Law, but had no crime worthy of death, or of bonds.

and learned that he was accused for reasons relating to their religious law, but that he has done nothing deserving imprisonment or execution.

I soon discovered it was something about their Jewish beliefs, certainly nothing worthy of imprisonment or death.

I discovered that the accusation dealt with questions about their Law, but that there was no charge against him that merited death or imprisonment.

and I found him to be accused over questions about their Law, but under no accusation deserving death or imprisonment.

whom I found to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

I found out that the accusations were concerning questions of their law, and that there was no charge that merited death or imprisonment.

[Where] I found that he was charged in regard to questions of their own law, but he was accused of nothing that would call for death or [even] for imprisonment.

I learned that these people said Paul did some things that were wrong by their own laws, but no charge was worthy of jail or death.

Then he wrote this letter: From Claudius Lysias, to the Most Honorable Governor Felix: Greetings! I rescued this man from a Jewish mob. They had seized him and were about to kill him when I learned that he was a Roman citizen. So I sent in my soldiers. Wanting to know what he had done wrong, I had him brought before their council. It turned out to be a squabble turned vicious over some of their religious differences, but nothing remotely criminal. The next thing I knew, they had cooked up a plot to murder him. I decided that for his own safety I’d better get him out of here in a hurry. So I’m sending him to you. I’m informing his accusers that he’s now under your jurisdiction.

I found he was being accused concerning questions of their law, but there was no charge that deserved death or imprisonment.

I found him accused in regard to questions of their law, but with no charge deserving death or imprisonment.

I found that he was accused concerning questions of their law, but was charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.

There I could see that he was accused concerning questions of their law, but was not guilty of anything worthy of death or of bonds.

I found out that he had not done a thing for which he deserved to die or be put in prison; the accusation against him had to do with questions about their own law.

And I found, that he was accused of questions of their law, but he had no crime worthy the death, either bonds. [Whom I found to be accused of questions of the law of them, forsooth having no crime worthy the death, or bonds.]

There I discovered that he was being accused in relation to disputes about their law, but that he was not being charged with anything for which he would deserve to die or to be imprisoned.

and learned that the charges concern only their religious laws. This man isn't guilty of anything for which he should die or even be put in jail.

I found that he was accused about questions of their law, but charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.

He further wrote a letter to Felix of which this is a copy: “Claudius Lysias sends greeting to his excellency the governor Felix. “This man had been seized by the Jews and was on the point of being murdered by them when I arrived with my troops and rescued him, since I had discovered that he was a Roman citizen. Wishing to find out what the accusation was that they were making against him, I had him brought down to their Sanhedrin. There I discovered he was being accused over questions of their laws, and that there was no charge against him which deserved either death or imprisonment. Now, however, that I have received private information of a plot against his life, I have sent him to you without delay. At the same time I have notified his accusers that they must make their charges against him in your presence.”

I found that he was accused concerning questions of their law but was charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.

I found that he was accused concerning questions of their law, but was charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.

I discovered that they were accusing him about questions related to their Law. I found no charge deserving of death or imprisonment.

and I discovered that he was accused in regard to questions and issues in their Law, but [he was] under no accusation that would call for the penalty of death or [even] for imprisonment.

I found that he was being accused about questions of their law, but charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.

I discovered that he was accused in matters of controversial questions of their law and not of any charge deserving death or imprisonment.

and I found that he was being accused regarding questions in their Law, but was not charged with anything deserving death or imprisonment.

I ·learned [L found; discovered] that the accusation had to do with ·questions [debates; disputed matters] about their own law [C the law of Moses], but no charge was worthy of death or ·jail [chains].

I found that he was accused concerning issues of their law, but charged with nothing worthy of death or imprisonment.

I found that he was accused about questions of their law, but charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.

I found out that the charge against him was based on questions about their law. But there was no charge against him worthy of death or prison.

Whom I perceived to be accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds.

I found that he was charged in connection with questions of their “Torah” but that there was no charge deserving death or prison.

I found out that their complaints were to do with their law. But he had not done anything wrong enough to die or to be put into prison.

I found that he was accused concerning questions of their law, but was charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.

"I found he was being accused about issues of their Torah and the charge was nothing worthy of mavet or of imprisonment.

and found their accusations had to do with disputes about their own laws. He wasn’t accused of anything for which he deserved to die or to be put into prison.

I found him being accused of controversial matters about their law, but charged with nothing worthy of death or imprisonment.

This is what I learned: The Jews said this man did some things that were wrong. But these charges were about their own Jewish laws, and there was nothing worthy of jail or death.

I learned that the Jews said Paul did some things that were wrong. But these charges were about their own laws. And no charge was worthy of jail or death.

I found he was accused concerning controversial questions of their law, but having no charge deserving death or imprisonment.

I found that the accusation had to do with questions about their law, but there was no charge against him that deserved death or imprisonment.

whom I found being accused about issues of their Law, but having no accusation worthy of death or imprisonment.